{"id":57290,"date":"2021-08-23T11:28:00","date_gmt":"2021-08-23T10:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abl-group.com\/abl\/?post_type=case-study&p=57290"},"modified":"2024-05-08T11:08:07","modified_gmt":"2024-05-08T10:08:07","slug":"development-of-a-maintenance-management-regime-cmms-build","status":"publish","type":"case-study","link":"https:\/\/abl-group.com\/abl\/case-studies\/development-of-a-maintenance-management-regime-cmms-build\/","title":{"rendered":"Development of a maintenance management regime (CMMS build)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/span>
<\/div>
\n

Client:<\/strong> FPSO Operator<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Asset:<\/strong> FPSO <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Project Objective:<\/strong> To deliver a digital twin of the maintainable physical equipment and their functional locations within the CMMS, determine how critical the equipment is and the impact it can have to the safety, environmental, business and production of the asset if it failed to function, and assign optimised levels of maintenance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Software:<\/strong> Effio\u2122<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Location:<\/strong> Global<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

Project synopsis<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

ABL was contracted to begin building the CMMS data when vessel was in the latter stages of being constructed to assure readiness of an optimised maintenance management regime when the project moved into start-up and subsequent operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A lack of internal capability and CMMS build software in-house triggered the requirement for external support. With an already established maintenance management partnership with the FPSO operator in place, combined with our extensive experience and CMMS build software tools that are able to unlock time and cost efficiencies in the project delivery, ABL was selected to deliver this CMMS build.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

What we did<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Tag extraction from engineering drawings<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Asset register and functional location hierarchy build<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Equipment classification using ISO 14224<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Equipment criticality assessment and assignment<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Maintenance task assignment, this also included a comparison between the FPSO operators traditional maintenance assignment methodology and their proposed new Blueprint approach to help further refine the content and application<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Further equipment classification to assign flags to tags (Ex, SCE, regulations, SIL, CBM and CHS)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Alignment of CMMS with external maintenance registers (e.g., PSV register)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Review of As-Built documentation and update of all required CMMS data following completion of construction<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
    \n
    \"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

    <\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
    <\/div>\n\n\n\n

    Project deliverables<\/h2>\n\n\n\n